GEODETIC DATUM: WGS84 ยท CLIENT-SIDE PRECISION ยท NO SIGN-UP
Open Map Lab
Home/Size Comparisons
Geodesic Curvature & Projection Science

True Country & State Size Comparisons

Standard flat wall maps distort our perception of the planet. Explore our library of side-by-side geographic comparisons corrected for Web Mercator latitude stretching.

Curated Comparisons34States & Sovereign Nations
Measurement StandardWGS84Geodesic Ellipsoidal Integral
Distortion AnalysisTissotIndicatrix Latitude Factor
Source StandardsUN & CensusDecennial & UN Stats

Browse Size Comparisons

Select any comparison below to view detailed demographic tables, area ratios, and Mercator exaggeration factors.

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
1.28x

Texas vs France (Metropolitan)

While many assume European powers dwarf American states, Texas is substantially larger than Metropolitan France. Texas spans 268,596 square miles (695,662 kmยฒ) compared to France's 210,016 square miles (543,940 kmยฒ). However, France holds over double the population of Texas.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
1.95x

Texas vs Germany

Texas is almost double the size of Germany. Texas covers 268,596 square miles (695,662 kmยฒ), while Germany covers 138,065 square miles (357,588 kmยฒ). However, Germany's population of 84.4 million people is almost triple that of Texas.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
2.87x

Texas vs United Kingdom

Texas is nearly three times the size of the entire United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland combined). The UK covers 93,628 square miles while Texas spans 268,596 square miles.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
1.64x

Texas vs California

Texas and California are the two most populous states in the US. In terms of land area, Texas is decisively larger, covering 268,596 sq mi compared to California's 163,696 sq mi. California, however, maintains a larger population with over 39.5 million residents.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต
1.84x

Texas vs Japan

Texas is 1.84 times the size of Japan. Texas covers 268,596 square miles while Japan spans 145,937 square miles. However, Japan houses more than four times the population of Texas (125.1 million vs 29.1 million).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น
1.41x

California vs Italy

California is 41% larger than Italy. California covers 163,696 square miles (423,970 kmยฒ) compared to Italy's 116,348 square miles (301,340 kmยฒ). Italy has a larger population (58.8M vs 39.5M).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
1.75x

California vs United Kingdom

California covers 163,696 square miles, making it 1.75 times larger than the entire United Kingdom (93,628 square miles). California's economy is also slightly larger than the UK's GDP.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต
1.12x

California vs Japan

California is roughly 12% larger than Japan. California covers 163,696 sq mi compared to Japan's 145,937 sq mi. However, Japan has more than three times California's population.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
1.19x

California vs Germany

California is 18.6% larger than Germany by land area (163,696 sq mi vs 138,065 sq mi). Germany has over double California's population.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
2.48x

Alaska vs Texas

Alaska is the largest state in the US by a wide margin, covering 665,384 square miles compared to Texas's 268,596 square miles. You could fit nearly two and a half Texases inside Alaska. Conversely, Texas has nearly 40 times the population of Alaska.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ
0.22x

Alaska vs Australia

While Alaska looks massive on conventional classroom maps, Australia dwarfs it in true physical area. Australia covers 2,969,907 square miles, compared to Alaska's 665,384 square miles. Australia is 4.46 times larger than Alaska.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑVS๐ŸŒ
0.07x

Greenland vs Africa

The comparison between Greenland and Africa is the single most notorious demonstration of Mercator projection distortion. On standard web maps, Greenland appears roughly equal in size to the entire African continent. In reality, Africa is 14 times larger: Africa spans 30,370,000 kmยฒ compared to Greenland's 2,166,086 kmยฒ.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑVS๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ
0.28x

Greenland vs Australia

Australia is 3.55 times larger than Greenland. Australia spans 2,969,907 square miles (7,692,024 kmยฒ) compared to Greenland's 836,330 square miles (2,166,086 kmยฒ).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
0.22x

Greenland vs United States

The United States covers 3,796,742 square miles, making it 4.54 times larger than Greenland (836,330 square miles). Greenland is roughly the size of the eastern US states combined.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑVS๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท
0.25x

Greenland vs Brazil

Brazil is nearly 4 times larger than Greenland. Brazil covers 3,287,957 square miles (8,515,767 kmยฒ) compared to Greenland's 836,330 square miles (2,166,086 kmยฒ).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑVS๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
0.66x

Greenland vs India

India is 1.52 times larger than Greenland. India covers 1,269,219 square miles while Greenland covers 836,330 square miles. In population, India has roughly 25,000 times more people than Greenland.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
0.95x

Australia vs Contiguous United States

Australia and the contiguous 48 United States are strikingly similar in physical size. Australia covers 2,969,907 square miles, while the Lower 48 US states cover 3,120,426 square miles (a difference of just 5%).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บVS๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ
1.28x

Australia vs Europe (without Russia)

Australia spans 2,969,907 square miles, making it larger than all European nations combined outside of Russia (approx. 2.32 million sq mi).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บVS๐ŸŒ
0.56x

Russia vs Africa

Russia is the largest country on Earth by area (6.6 million sq mi), but Africa is a continent spanning 11.7 million sq mi. Africa is nearly 1.8 times larger than Russia, despite Mercator projections showing Russia dominating the top of the map.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
1.74x

Russia vs United States

Russia covers 6,601,670 square miles compared to the United States' 3,796,742 square miles. Russia is 1.74 times larger than the US. However, the US has more than double Russia's population.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บVS๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
1.71x

Russia vs Canada

Russia and Canada are the world's two largest countries by total area. Russia covers 6.6 million sq mi (17.1M kmยฒ), while Canada covers 3.86 million sq mi (9.98M kmยฒ). Russia is 1.71 times larger than Canada.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
1.02x

Canada vs United States

Canada and the United States are almost identical in total area. Canada spans 3,855,103 square miles compared to the US's 3,796,742 square miles. Canada is just 1.5% larger by total area.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
0.98x

China vs United States

The United States and China are remarkably close in total geographic footprint. The United States covers 3,796,742 sq mi while China covers 3,705,407 sq mi. The US is about 2.5% larger in total area, though their land-only totals vary by less than 1%.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ทVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
1.05x

Brazil vs Contiguous United States

Brazil is actually larger than the 48 contiguous United States by over 167,000 square miles (3,287,957 sq mi vs 3,120,426 sq mi). It is only when including Alaska that the total US exceeds Brazil.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณVS๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ
0.89x

India vs Western & Central Europe

India spans 1,269,219 square miles, almost matching the entire landmass of Western and Central Europe (1.42 million sq mi). India's population is more than three times that of the entire European continent.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ตVS๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
1.56x

Japan vs United Kingdom

Japan is 1.56 times larger than the United Kingdom. Japan covers 145,937 square miles compared to the UK's 93,628 square miles. Japan also has nearly double the population of the UK.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งVS๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
0.91x

United Kingdom vs New Zealand

New Zealand is 10.5% larger than the United Kingdom. New Zealand covers 103,483 square miles compared to the UK's 93,628 square miles. However, the UK has over 13 times the population of New Zealand.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝVS๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ
3.88x

Mexico vs Spain

Mexico is nearly four times larger than Spain. Mexico spans 758,449 square miles (1,964,375 kmยฒ) compared to Spain's 195,364 square miles (505,990 kmยฒ). Mexico also has almost three times Spain's population.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ทVS๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
2.19x

Turkey (Tรผrkiye) vs Germany

Turkey covers 302,535 square miles (783,562 kmยฒ), making it 2.19 times larger than Germany (138,065 sq mi / 357,588 kmยฒ). Both nations have nearly identical populations (~85 million).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฌVS๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
2.42x

Madagascar vs United Kingdom

Madagascar is the world's fourth-largest island, covering 226,658 square miles (587,041 kmยฒ). It is 2.42 times larger than the United Kingdom (93,628 square miles).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ทVS๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
1.28x

Argentina vs Greenland

Argentina covers 1,073,518 square miles, making it 28% larger than Greenland (836,330 square miles). On Mercator maps, Greenland appears several times larger than Argentina.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌVS๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
1.84x

Egypt vs France (Metropolitan)

Egypt covers 387,048 square miles (1,002,450 kmยฒ), making it 1.84 times larger than Metropolitan France (210,016 square miles / 543,940 kmยฒ).

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ชVS๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
1.06x

Sweden vs California

Sweden covers 173,860 square miles, making it just 6% larger than California (163,696 square miles). California has almost four times Sweden's population.

View True Size Breakdown
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธVS๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
0.43x

Iceland vs United Kingdom

The United Kingdom covers 93,628 square miles compared to Iceland's 39,768 square miles. The UK is 2.35 times larger than Iceland.

View True Size Breakdown

The Science of Cartographic Size Distortions

Representing a three-dimensional oblate spheroid on a flat, two-dimensional sheet of paper or screen mathematically requires compromise. Carl Friedrich Gauss proved in his Theorema Egregium (1828) that a spherical surface cannot be mapped to a plane without distortion of either area, angle, distance, or shape.

In 1569, Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator developed a conformal cylindrical projection specifically designed for marine navigation. Because it preserves angles and renders rhumb lines (lines of constant compass bearing) as straight lines, sailors could plot direct courses with a straightedge. However, to preserve angles, Mercator had to stretch the spacing between parallels of latitude by the secant of the latitude:

k = sec(ฯ†) = 1 / cos(ฯ†) ย ย โ†’ย ย  Area Scale Factor = secยฒ(ฯ†)

As a result, equatorial landmasses (like Africa, South America, and southern India) are depicted at their authentic scale (scale factor โ‰ˆ 1.0), whereas high-latitude landmasses like Greenland (72ยฐN, factor โ‰ˆ 10.5x), Alaska (64ยฐN, factor โ‰ˆ 5.2x), and Northern Europe (60ยฐN, factor โ‰ˆ 4.0x) are vastly exaggerated. Open Map Lab eliminates this bias by evaluating true ellipsoidal surface integrals on the WGS84 datum.